Skip to content
Putting technology to work.
Insights to guide decisions and action.

Search articles

Special feature: Getting started with AI at work

What are AI agents? | How they work, how to build them, and how to use them in business explained for SMBs

For those looking to integrate AI agents into business operations

What you will learn in this article

  • Mechanisms and use cases of AI agents
  • Options for building and deploying
  • How to think about testing on a single workflow

This explanation is based on publicly available information. Before implementing, please review your company's environment and the latest specifications for each product.

Table of contents · 7 items

"Our CEO told us to bring AI agents into our business, but we can't explain how they differ from ordinary generative AI, what they can be used for in our company, or how to build one." Consultations like this from SMB IT staff have surged. Many companies find themselves in an atmosphere where buzzwords run ahead of reality, feeling pressured to do something without grasping the substance.

In this article, we explain what AI agents are in accessible terms, covering fundamentals, mechanisms, types, build methods, business applications, and pitfalls during adoption. Our goal is to provide non-engineer clients and IT personnel with a solid foundation for making investment decisions.

What is an AI agent? Moving from Q&A to an AI that organizes its own workflow

An AI agent refers to an AI that formulates steps toward a human-provided goal, invokes necessary tools, and handles multiple tasks sequentially.

The distinction from traditional generative AI is straightforward. Asking ChatGPT to summarize meeting minutes is a single question-and-answer exchange. A human inputs text, the AI replies, and the human enters the next prompt. In contrast, if you ask an AI agent to "summarize minutes for this project, log action items in issue tracking, and remind the assignee via Slack," it determines and executes the entire workflow on its own: summarize → log → notify. Humans only need to review the final result.

This ability to use tools independently and execute multi-step workflows sequentially is the decisive difference separating agents from chat-only generative AI.

Types of AI agents and practical business examples

Even under the umbrella term "agent," characteristics vary depending on the delegated scope. Here are examples easy for SMBs to envision.

TypeWhat it doesSMB example
Workflow automation typeExecutes routine sequential tasks on behalf of staffInitial sorting of inquiry emails and draft replies
Research typeAutonomously gathers and summarizes informationDrafting competitive and market research
Development support typeGenerates, modifies, and reviews codeInternal tool modifications, autonomous mode operations in Claude Code
Internal knowledge typeSearches internal documents and provides answersQ&A on manuals and company policies

The key is not attempting company-wide agent deployment right away, but testing on a single problematic workflow. Best candidates are high-volume, rule-based tasks with fault tolerance. Conversely, assigning mission-critical tasks where errors cannot be tolerated, such as final accounting sign-offs, right from the start invites failure.

Mechanisms: Why can it act autonomously?

The key to an agent acting autonomously rests on three core elements.

First is tool calling mechanisms. As a standard enabling AI to invoke external tools like sending emails, querying databases, or booking calendars, MCP (Model Context Protocol) has spread rapidly. We explain this in detail in our MCP complete guide; this capability transforms AI from merely stating things to actually doing them. Mechanisms for querying databases with natural language are an extension of this.

Second is memory. Without remembering context from preceding actions, users would need to explain everything from scratch each time. Architectures that provide AI agents with operational context represent the dividing line for practical utility.

Third is instruction design (prompting). Agent precision is almost entirely dictated by the quality of instructions supplied. Practical workflows for drafting prompts across various business scenarios can be found in our Gemini prompt template library.

How to build an AI agent: Three options

When it comes to building, three paths exist depending on organizational capabilities.

  • Assemble using no-code/SaaS tools: Platforms like Dify and various agent builders have proliferated, enabling setup without writing code. This is the fastest route for small trials. However, limits emerge when connecting with complex workflows or proprietary legacy systems
  • Build in-house via APIs: If internal engineers are present, custom agents can be built using APIs from OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and others. This offers high flexibility but requires expertise in design, operations, and security guardrails
  • Commission custom development: The route of delegating from the design phase of where and how to integrate agents into operations. Partnering with a vendor who understands your business processes determines success

The pragmatic approach is to start with no-code for small trials, and move to API development or custom development for deep operational integration. Whichever path you choose, the first step is not building, but deciding on one specific workflow to delegate.

Efficiency gains and common pitfalls to watch for

When applied successfully, AI agents deliver real value by increasing throughput without increasing headcount. On the other hand, companies that stumble during deployment exhibit common patterns.

The most common failure is trying to automate everything without narrowing down tasks, resulting in stalled projects. The second most common is failing to design human checkpoints, leaving runaway actions and errors unnoticed. Irreversible actions like payments or external communications strictly require human approval gates. The third is ending with vague implementations without measuring results. Unless you define upfront how many hours of work this deployment should reduce, you cannot evaluate whether to continue.

Summary: Start with one workflow, keep it small, and measure

There is no need to approach AI agents with trepidation as an all-encompassing corporate transformation. The sequence is simple: first, pick one high-volume task with fixed procedures. Run a trial using no-code tools or a small prototype. Measure reduction in processing time quantitatively. Once results emerge, expand to adjacent workflows. Following this formula—one workflow, keep it small, measure—prevents wasted investment and front-line disruption.

GleamHub has extensive experience in custom development integrating generative AI and AI agents into core business systems. If you have concerns such as "we want to consult on mapping out which company tasks are suited for AI agents" or "we tried no-code tools but hit a wall with workflow integration," please feel free to reach out via our development, AI, and automation consultation desk. From identifying the initial workflow to delegate, to designing human approval workflows for secure operation, we will collaborate tailored to your operational realities.

Sources

Share this articleXFacebook
Kakeru Suzuki

Fascinated by the possibilities of technology, has had a deep interest in programming and digital art since student days

Continue reading by topic: Getting started with AI at work

Turn this article's theme into your company's next step

Thinking together, starting from the work you entrust to AI.

We organize your current operations and data to define the scope entrusted to AI, what humans should review, and how to run trials.

  • Target operations
  • Data to use
  • How to verify effectiveness
Consult on AI adoption for your business

You can consult with us from the initial conceptual stage. Details from this article will be carried over to the inquiry form.

Receive the latest articles by email